Incomplete evidence: evidence was cut short before completion (the synthetic form-input probe did not complete its test, so input-capture detection is incomplete). Counts for the affected evidence are lower bounds; families that completed carry only their ordinary limits. The evidence receipt states the exact per-visit quality.
What this actually means
neocities.org triggered fingerprint-like browser API patterns.
3 browser-fingerprinting heuristics matched. These are heuristic review signals, not proof of fingerprinting intent.
The scan observed signals a non-expert should not have to decode from raw request tables. Some detector evidence was incomplete; each affected detector card states its own retained or unavailable scope, while completed request, cookie, and storage measurements keep their recorded exactness.
The cards below translate the evidence into plain language. Where a measured distribution exists, severity ranks this visit against percentiles from this report's cohort, with each percentile card naming its metric-specific measured-site denominator; otherwise it uses fixed reference thresholds. That cohort is drawn from a curated set of popular, mostly commercial sites, not a random sample of the web. The request log, domain table, and methodology remain below for verification.
53 requests observed in one controlled visit.
Not flagged
No requests matched Brave Shields filter lists
No requests matched the default filter lists of Brave Shields, the ad and tracker blocker built into the Brave browser.
Computed with Brave's own ad-block engine and default filter lists in classification mode: matched requests were not blocked by the scanner and remain in this report's observed request counts. Matching shows what Shields would target on this visit's traffic; an actual Shields visit blocks these and also prevents their follow-on requests, so this number is neither a measured block count nor the total effect.
The hand-curated service catalog separately matched 0 request rows in this visit.Show matched requests
Low signal
No change observed in the Brave-list blocking attempt
The blocking visit ran with the scanner configured to apply Brave's ad-block engine and default Shields filter lists. It was a simulation in this scanner's browser, not a live Brave-browser visit, and application was not verified. Compared with the unblocked visit, it showed no change in the comparable metrics (third-party requests, third-party cookies and tracking-related service requests).
The blocking visit's engine directly blocked 0 requests. Ad rotation, experiments, or caching between the two visits can offset or outweigh what blocking removed, which is how totals can hold steady or rise despite direct blocks. A single paired comparison can also reflect run-to-run variance (ad rotation, caching, experiments), so treat this as no observed difference for this pair of visits, not evidence that blocking removes nothing.
Signed per-metric differences between the two visits; nothing is summed across metrics.Show matched requests
Context
No known services matched
This scan did not match any third-party domains to the service catalog or another identity source.
No known operator or catalog entity was matched. This scan could not identify 4 of the 4 third-party hosts recorded here, so it cannot say who operates them. That is a limit of identity coverage, not evidence about the site.
7 cross-site requests across 4 third-party hosts.Below the median for third-party domains across the 90 sites measured for this metric.Show third-party requests
Not flagged
No requests to major-platform domains were recorded
No requests to catalogued Google, Meta, TikTok, X, Microsoft, LinkedIn, or Pinterest domains were observed in this visit.
Major-platform domains were not observed in this single passive visit; interaction-gated requests could still load for real users.
The scanner observed cookie metadata whose domain crossed the scanned site's registrable-domain boundary. This report does not retain cookie values or partition keys, so it does not establish whether a cookie was a persistent identifier or could recognize a visitor across sites.
1 cookie total in this report.At or above the median for third-party cookies across the 90 sites measured for this metric.
Context
Input-monitoring signal involving a script from another domain
Listener coverage that could observe typing-related input events was registered through call chains that included a script served from another registrable domain. This scan did not establish the operator of that script.
This is a behavioral instrumentation signal from listener registration, stack-attributed script origins, and known-vendor requests: it shows the page was instrumented to observe interaction, not that anything was transmitted. Stack attribution records the script origins present in the bounded registration call chain. A cross-site origin in that chain does not by itself establish that the cross-site script registered the listener. That is because first-party code can register its own listeners through a helper served from elsewhere. A different registrable domain is also not by itself a different operator: sites commonly serve their own scripts from a separate asset domain. The card therefore says third party only when the catalog or reviewed ownership attributes an origin to another organization. On scanners that run the active keystroke-capture probe, actual transmission is tested separately (a synthetic value is typed, never real input, and no typed values are collected). Treat this card as a review prompt rather than proof.
Session-recording listener coverage: 19 interaction-listener registrations with https://hcaptcha.com/ in the registration call chain. Input-monitoring listener coverage: 7 input-listener registrations with https://hcaptcha.com/ in the registration call chain.
Worth checking
Behavioral fingerprinting heuristics matched
3 behavioral heuristics matched: Offline audio rendering heuristic, Canvas fingerprinting heuristic and Canvas font probing heuristic.
These heuristics look for behavior patterns such as canvas readback after drawing, repeated canvas font measurement, WebGL entropy reads, offline audio rendering, or WebRTC peer-connection setup. They are review prompts for this visit, not proof of cross-site identity tracking.
Offline audio rendering heuristic: 1 offline render with audio.OfflineAudioContext.createAnalyser, audio.OfflineAudioContext.createDynamicsCompressor and audio.OfflineAudioContext.createOscillator, plus 1 other. Canvas fingerprinting heuristic: 1 canvas matched; reads: canvas.toDataURL. Canvas font probing heuristic: 104 measureText calls across up to 12 fonts; measured text contents are not stored.
Raw evidence
Open the interactive evidence explorer
The findings above are built from the stored report. Load the request rows, domains, cookies, storage keys, browser signals, visit phases, charts and CSV export when you want to check them; the versioned report JSON is always available below without this interface.
This versioned report is currently retained in the public corpus. Follow the currently retained site history, repeat the same public route when it is available, or request a transparent evidence correction.
cut short: the synthetic form-input probe did not complete its test, so input-capture detection is incomplete; derived from status and warnings
Scanner
playwright-chromium
Browser
153.0.8010.12
Redaction
not recorded by this schema
Provenance
Exact build and instrument digests were not recorded by this legacy schema.
Variant visit
Started
Run quality
cut short: the synthetic form-input probe did not complete its test, so input-capture detection is incomplete; derived from status and warnings
Scanner
playwright-chromium
Browser
153.0.8010.12
Redaction
not recorded by this schema
Provenance
Exact build and instrument digests were not recorded by this legacy schema.
Recorded provenance is self-reported measurement metadata, not a cryptographic attestation. The public versioned report JSON contains the retained public evidence; see the methodology for interpretation and retention limits.
This report covers what the scanner measures, not everything a site can do. 17 browser surfaces are not instrumented at all (Every page except the one that was scanned; Anything that only loads after scrolling or interaction; Why a request happened, as a causal chain; and 14 others), 3 capabilities are declined by policy, and 3 are outside what any single visit can see. Their absence from this report is not evidence that they did not occur. Read the published coverage boundary.
Detector accuracy is unmeasured. No calibration study currently publishes a precision or recall for the detectors on this page, so a detector match here is a recorded observation, not a calibrated classification. A study has been recorded for pixel-events and does not support a published rate under the current build. How detector accuracy is measured.
Severity percentiles come from this report's exact schema, methodology, tracker-catalog, ServiceRole-taxonomy, metric-contract, producer, and Global Privacy Control cohort. Each percentile card's measured sites are among 99 sites with a successful load across all cohorts. Other methodologies, request-capped visits, and post-choice consent visits are excluded from each card's denominator, while failed or block-page attempts are outside that coverage.
Approved use boundary: This report is investigative evidence that requires independent corroboration. It is not a standalone legal determination and not the sole exhibit in a legal proceeding. Recorded in this project's release manifest on .